Skip to main content
Advertising

Official website of the New England Patriots

replay
Replay: Best of the Week on Patriots.com Radio Fri Dec 20 - 10:00 AM | Sun Dec 22 - 01:55 PM

Player discipline tops owners' meetings agenda

Roger Goodell's first full NFL meeting as commissioner is beginning with one item at the top of the agenda: a crackdown on players who get in trouble with the law. The meetings formally begin Monday with Goodell's state of the NFL address to the owners.

PHOENIX, Ariz. (March 25, 2007) -- Roger Goodell's first full NFL meeting as commissioner is beginning with one item at the top of the agenda: a crackdown on players who get in trouble with the law.

The meetings formally begin Monday with Goodell's state of the NFL address to the owners. But everyone was on hand Sunday for committee meetings.

As did his predecessor, Paul Tagliabue, Goodell is likely to say the state of the league is good. However, he is also expected to announce, most likely on Tuesday, new and strengthened rules for discipline for what is perceived as an increasing number of players with legal issues.

The new discipline is likely to be harsher, with longer suspensions than the current two or four games, and punishment handed down more quickly. In the past, the league most often has waited until the legal process has been exhausted before suspending players for violations of the law. Now, with the concurrence of the NFL Players Association and many players, it may not.

Still, it is likely to be vigorously discussed.

"Everyone agrees you have to have increased discipline," John Mara, co-owner of the New York Giants said. "But you have to take legal issues into account on how quickly you can act and you have to take into account the form the discipline would take -- if, for example, you discipline teams that have multiple players who get in trouble. But what's been happening isn't good for the anyone."

Added Miami's Wayne Huizenga:

"It's important to have a policy and I want to hear what they have to say because I have not seen anything presented. It's something I am in favor of if it is crystal clear. It depends on what the criteria is presented in it. As long as you know what it calls for, I'm in favor of it. It's definitely an important issue for us."

The team in the spotlight the most has been the Cincinnati Bengals, who during the last year had nine players arrested on a variety of charges ranging from boating while drunk to spousal abuse and weapons violations.

But the two players who have had the most difficulty are Adam "Pacman" Jones of Tennessee, who has had 10 separate encounters with the police, and Tank Johnson of Chicago, who was sentenced last week to four months in jail on weapons charges.

The new policy in part stems from a meeting during the Scouting Combine in Indianapolis involving Goodell; Gene Upshaw, executive director of the NFLPA; and a group of about 10 players. All agreed that stronger and quicker discipline is needed.

The question of blaming teams for player behavior stems from information gathered before the draft.

"We usually know who the problem players are," Mara said. "The question is whether you hold teams responsible for drafting them. In some cases, you just have to decide whether you're going to bypass unbelievable talent because you know a player could be a problem."

There also could be several rules changes this week, many of them minor.

The biggest might be moving the kickoff in overtime from the 30-yard line, the spot in regulation, to the 35.

Atlanta general manager Rich McKay, the competition committee's co-chairman, said last week that the group believed the kickoff spot was the major reason 62 percent of teams winning the coin toss won overtime games last season -- it gave them better field position throughout the overtime. McKay said it stemmed from the change in 1998 that moved the kickoff back to the 30 and added the "K-ball," a kicking ball harder to kick deep.

Until then, winners and losers of the toss had won the games just about equally.

The rule would have to be approved by three-quarters of the teams, as would a variety of other proposed rules changes. Of those, the one with the most impact would make instant replay, which is due to expire after two more seasons, a permanent part of the league's rules.

This article has been reproduced in a new format and may be missing content or contain faulty links. Please use the Contact Us link in our site footer to report an issue.

Related Content

Advertising

Latest News

Presented by
Advertising

Trending Videos

Advertising

In Case You Missed It

Presented by
Advertising